[This message was posted by Joseph Horowitz of AEGIS Software Inc. <[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/1352c9ce - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Exactly; the sub-range would allow us and other vendors to completely avoid conflicts when deployed at a common client. Thanks! -Joey > Thanks, the aspect of issues between multiple intra-firm applications is > interesting. If I understand you correctly, then such a sub-range with > the 10-20K range would be intra-firm and intra-application whereas the > rest if intra-firm but inter-application. I am assuming that you have > run into conflicts in the past with other intra-firm applications. > > > As a vendor we use tags internally within our application. Where our > > products are installed we would not want a conflict with other in- > > house or other vendor applications. Having a reserved range for > > exclusive use only within any single application (e.g. a set of > > components from a single vendor) is a good way to guarantee that. > > > > > What is the distinction to the rest of the 10-20K range in your > > > view? The entire range 10,000 - 19,999 is private and not subject to > > > bilateral agreement between firms. > > > > > > Regards, Hanno. > > > > > > > May I suggest adding an Intra-application range for private tags, > > > > e.g. 18,000-19,999 > > > > > > > > Thanks! -Joey [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
