[This message was posted by Paul Raskin of RJ O'Brien <[email protected]> to 
the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You 
can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/a16dc997 - 
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

Hi Pravin,

You are correct; that's the way the fields would map for the hierarchy you laid 
out. 49 is the broker/firm, 50 is the dealer/trader, and 1 is just the account, 
as you said.

Paul

> Consider the hierarchy - brokers -> dealers -> trading account
> 
> For NewOrderSingle, i am guessing the corresponding FIX fields would be:
> 
> Broker = SenderCompID Dealer = SenderSubID Trading Account = Account
> 
> Is this correct? Please confirm.


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.


  • [FIX] Re: ID fields 'General Q/A' forum at fixprotocol . org

Reply via email to