[This message was posted by Jim Northey of The LaSalle Technology Group <[email protected]> to the "Transport Independence Framework" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/49. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/586f5a68 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Mahesh, I don't believe that we reached this consensus on FIXT.1.1 in terms of extending the tag order to SenderCompID, TargetCompID and ApplVerID. There was considerable push back. > In FIX_Transport_1.1.pdf page 38 of 66 (March 2008) defines a Garbled > message as > > [start quote] > > BeginString (tag #8) is not the first tag in a message or is not of the > format 8=FIXT.n.m. > > BodyLength (tag #9) is not the second tag in a message or does not > contain the correct byte count. > > MsgType (tag #35) is not the third tag in a message. > > Checksum (tag #10) is not the last tag or contains an incorrect value. > > [End quote] > > The following additions should be made to the above list of definitions > of a garbled message > > SenderCompID (tag #49) is not the fourth tag in a message. > > TargetCompID (tag #56) is not the fifth tag in a message. > > ApplVerID (tag #1128) if present in message is not the sixth tag in > a message. > > Non numeric Tag is present in the message, for example ^X=123^ > > (Request :- If this is not the correct forum for discussing > FIX_Transport_1.1.pdf, please let me know the correct forum) > > Regards, > K. Mahesh [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]]
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
