[This message was posted by Robert Mitchell of NYU <[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/90a4d632 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
So, does anyone know why FinancingDetails shouldn't be part of the Instrument? We have all the fields that allow one to specify an Instrument as a REPO, Product (460), SecurityType (167), SecuritySubType (762), but there is no way to indicate the TerminationType (788) or the Start and End Dates (916, 917) or the other fields of <FinancingDetails>. > Exactly, I want to be able to accept orders and provide market data > quote updates on a standard overnight gcf repo. > > > The FinancingDetails component block is a separate component block > > from the Instrument component block. The FinancingDetails component > > block is in many messages including IOI, Order messages, Quote > > messages, TradeCapture messages. > > > > Which messages are you looking to use? By "standardize a financing > > arrangement" are you looking to defined a "standardized" repo to > > be traded? > > > > > I'd like to be able to offer clients a standard ON REPO. The problem > > > I'm running into is the lack of a FinancingDetails block in the > > > Instrument definition. > > > > > > FinancingDetails is associated only with IOIs and NewOrder... > > > messages. Is there any way in the existing specification to > > > standardize a financing arrangement as an Instrument? [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
