[This message was posted by Hanno Klein of Deutsche Börse Systems 
<[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/c2fdeef8 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

In the US, Away Markets could also be identified by the OPRA/SIAC Participant 
ID code instead of a MIC. Does it make sense to add a new PartyIDSource 
(TBD=OPRA/SIAC Participant ID) for that or should one use "C = Generally 
accepted market participant identifier (e.g. NASD mnemonic)". It is somewhat 
confusing that OPRA defines markets as "participants" whereas exchanges mean 
their members when they talk about participants.

Here is the list of currently valid values for OPRA/SIAC IDs:

A NYSE AMEX
B Boston Stock Exchange
C Chicago Board Options Exchange
I International Securities Exchange 
N NYSE ARCA
O Options Price Reporting Authority
Q NASDAQ Stock Market
X NASDAQ OMX PHLX
Z BATS Global Markets

If it is decided to add a new PartyIDSource, the same value should be added to 
tag 1133 ExDestinationIDSource.


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to