[This message was posted by Jim Northey of The LaSalle Technology Group 
<[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/55ec07f3 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

This can be argued either way, but from a practical standpoint MsgType n is 
provided as an alternative for XML payload and has been placed with session 
layer to make it available for implementers not requiring FIX. This is one of 
the great advantages of FIXT being overlooked by the industry (possibly the 
only one).

> [Start Quote from FIX.4.3 spec Vol 1 Page 9/49]
> 
> Introduction
> ------------
> 
> The session level is concerned with the delivery of data while the
> application level defines business related data content.
> 
> [End Quote]
> 
> I am quoting from the FIX.4.3 spec because XML_non_FIX was introduced
> in FIX.4.3, but this definition is the same in earlier versions also.
> Other Session messages help the connected FIX Engines maintain a
> stable Session.
> 
> [Start Quote from FIX.4.3 spec Vol 2 page 3 / 63]
> 
> TRANSMITTING FIXML OR OTHER XML-BASED CONTENT
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> It is possible to send FIXML or other XML-based content (“payload”) via
> the FIX Session Protocol. The FIXML or other XML-based content is
> enclosed in a traditional “Tag=Value” FIX standard header via the
> standard header’s XmlDataLen and XmlData fields and followed by the
> “Tag=Value” FIX standard trailer.
> 
> The generic MsgType field value for "XML message (e.g. non-FIX MsgType)"
> can be used when transmitting XML content which is not defined with a
> FIX MsgType.
> 
> [End Quote]
> 
> So the XML_non_FIX message would not have any content of value to the
> FIX Engine to maintain a stable Session and fits the definition of
> delivery of application level / business related data content which is
> defined as payload in. So the FIX Engine after Session level validation
> of a 35=n message would forward it to a business application for use /
> processing.
> 
> Just curious why is 35=n (XML_non_FIX) defined as a Session message
> rather than an Application message ? Is there any use case where
> XML_non_FIX is used to control the behaviour of a Session ?
> 
> Regards,
> K. Mahesh


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to