[This message was posted by Clark Sims of Acumen Software Development Inc <[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/aa54a9b5 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
At transacttools.net I read the following abobut sequence reset messages: The sequence reset can only increase the sequence number. If a sequence reset is received attempting to decrease the next expected sequence number the message should be rejected and treated as a serious error. I am looking at pages 26 and 27 of FIX Version 1.1 Errata for the Fix Session Protocol and I don't see requested sequence number too low, as one of the reject reasons. Does this mean I should use reason 99, other? Thanks in Advance, Clark [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
