[This message was posted by Jeffrey Croft of Plus Markets Group 
<[email protected]> to the "4.4 Changes" discussion forum at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/17. You can reply to it on-line at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/53fa0a72 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

Okay I understand, although it does look like 2 lists are being maintained as 
the enumerations might mean the same thing but the text is sometimes different.

Thx

> Your argument is semantically correct but this is one of a few cases where 
> the desire to re-use valid value lists leads to values that do not apply. The 
> choice was made to not maintain two overlapping value lists.
> 
> Similar issues arise with the re-use of component blocks where its fields do 
> not apply for every occurrence of the component block. The alternative is to 
> create dedicated blocks for each message type. There are also cases where 
> this has been done, i.e. it is a case by case decision to re-use valid values 
> / components or to create new elements that are slightly redundant to 
> existing ones.
> 
> Your Rules of Engagement should clearly define the set of valid values 
> supported for tag 300 vs. 368. This is where the FIX interface designer needs 
> to show his/her skills :-)
> 
> Regards,
> Hanno.
> 
> > Can someone please say what the difference is supposed to be? 
> > QuoteRejectReason (300) is outside the Quote entry block and so applies to 
> > the whole Mass Quote Message whereas QuoteEntryRejectReason (368) applies 
> > at Quote Entry level?
> > If thats the case the standard enumerations for 300 do not really make 
> > sense i.e. 7 = InvSpread and 8 = InvPx?


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to