This message is from: jen frame <jenfra...@gmail.com> Hi Jean!Well the idea, in the abstract, is a good one, but in actuality/practice it becomes FACISM. So as much as we may like there to be laws that dictate how many kids or how many horses a person can create, it can't be done in a democracy. So, what we need to do is SELF REGULATE. That is the same as being responsible. But sadly many horse breeders and horse owners don't want to act responsibly. Perhaps the breed organization itself could be involved in regulation--I have no idea what that would entail. I'll leave that idea up to the Mike Mays of the Fjord world to think about (or not). Jen
On 4/2/09, jern...@mosquitonet.com <jern...@mosquitonet.com> wrote: > > This message is from: jern...@mosquitonet.com > > Maybe there should be laws against people who can't take care of them > having too > many children, too, like China has....? > > Jean in Fairbanks, AK > > > This message is from: Robin Churchill <rbc...@yahoo.com> > > > > I have to say that this time, jen, I agree with you. The root of the > problem is > > that there are too many horses, too many dogs and cats, etc mainly > because people > > are allowed to do whatever they want to and dispose of companion-type > animals when > > it suits them. There should be much stricter regulation on breeding of > horses and > > other animals. People should not be able to just breed indiscriminately > then allow > > the animals to be discarded. > > > Important FjordHorse List Links: > Subscription Management: http://tinyurl.com/5msa7e > FH-L Archives: http://tinyurl.com/rcepw > Classified Ads: http://tinyurl.com/5b5g2f Important FjordHorse List Links: Subscription Management: http://tinyurl.com/5msa7e FH-L Archives: http://tinyurl.com/rcepw Classified Ads: http://tinyurl.com/5b5g2f
