Josh Green wrote:
Thanks a lot for the information, I'm excited about working on this
project again. I'd like to try and make a campaign out of it, make a
nice logo and little banner icons that people can put on web sites and
the like. Its about time proprietary formats cease to be used for
instrument compression (especially those that don't write clients for
other operating systems). Even windows users have experienced this with
sfpack, since they recently stopped supporting it. Nothing more annoying
then downloading a zip or rar instrument file only to find it has also
been compressed with sfark or sfpack. I guess the sfark people deserve
some credit, they have at least been promising a Linux client for a few
years now (still no sign of it though).
I was thinking of making FlacPak associated with flac (seems appropriate
since flac will be the primary technology used in the format), so I was
wondering about basing the FlacPak logo on the one found on the flac web
site (with the green/yellow/red level meter bars). How do you feel about
this? Any graphics I come up with in this regard I would certainly clear
with you before using it. Thanks again.
        Josh Green

You might try to contact the makers of FruityLoops. Right now their samples packs are in Ogg format (stored in a WAV IIRC). They like open and free formats (they also use the LAME encoder).




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Flac-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flac-dev

Reply via email to