On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:03:28AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> *AND* there is a major problem with liboggflac1. > > liboggflac1 did not change the soname (better check this, it might require a > soname change, check the seekable ogg-flac support stuff). CCing upstream on this. Josh, did 1.1.1 change interfaces in liboggflac? If so, it needs a soname change. > If it does, a new upload fixes it, and liboggflac1 should be generated by > the old-flac package. If it doesn't, then what should we do? libflac4 > would be mostly useless in that case. > > I will switch timidity to libflac6 in unstable, so that doesn't bother me > much, but flac is used by a lot of other stuff... I think it's best to just transition everything to current flac; it seems at least mostly backward-API-compatible (I haven't had to change anything so far, only recompile), and there aren't that many packages which use it. -- - mdz _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
