On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 23:04, Josh Coalson wrote: > we don't have any ARM optimizations yet, just x86 and ppc. but > yes, FLAC__lpc_restore_signal() will give the most bang for the > buck and is the easiest (it's just a multiply-accumulate-shift > loop).
Aw., I dont think I can look into this right now. However, I have some doubts. Is it possible for the frame->header.bits_per_sample, frame->header.sample_rate to differ from frame to frame?? -- Joe Steeve (http://www.joesteeve.org/) Z500 Development team (http://www.z500series.com/) Terminus Graphics Studios http://www.terminus.in/ _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
