--- Ralph Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:59:17PM -0800, Stephen F. Booth wrote: > > > [...] > > 'net.sourceforge.flac'. A standard UTI for application developers to > > use would help alleviate any confusion and could also eliminate > > potential sources of conflict in the UTI hierarchy. For example, I > > have seen org.xiph.flac used. > > I would suggest org.xiph.flac. At least if Josh really is intending > to move hosting of more than the lists....
yeah, I would second org.xiph.flac ____________________________________________________________________________________ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
