On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 09:07:56PM +1000, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > We will now have to prepare Internet-Drafts in preparation for new > RFCs for the new mime types and get into a discussion with IETF/IANA > as to changing the old registration. If that is not possible, we may > need to revert to the earlier suggestion of keeping .ogg for "anything > in ogg" rather than .ogx , and accept the problem that audio HW > players are going to barf on .ogg video files.
For what it's worth, I prefer this course in any case. So far, non-audio-non-video ogg files have been sufficiently scarce I don't think they warrant a separate .ogx extension. -r _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
