Hi, Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess the use of unsigned index variables was an accident. Changing > them back to int makes FLAC pass the "thorough" test suite on amd64. I was wondering why there isn't a FLAC_index (FLAC_index16 or FLAC_index32) type that would prevent someone from just "winging" it with a bad choice for an index to an array? Chris Arena
_______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev