Hi,

Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I guess the use of unsigned index variables was an accident.  Changing
> them back to int makes FLAC pass the "thorough" test suite on amd64.

I was wondering why there isn't a FLAC_index (FLAC_index16 or FLAC_index32)
type that would prevent someone from just "winging" it with a bad choice for
an index to an array?

Chris Arena
_______________________________________________
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Reply via email to