On Aug 7, 2009, at 20:58, Martin Leese wrote: > "Didier Dambrin" <di...@skynet.be> wrote: > ... >> I like FLAC on the paper because of its metadata preservation, in >> that riff >> tag, which is critical for my needs. > > Try using WavPack, http://www.wavpack.com/ > > This can losslessly compress 32-bit floating > point WAVE-EX files, and faithfully preserves > every chunk (which FLAC does not do). It is > also free.
Your statement is misleading as written. It should say > Try using WavPack, http://www.wavpack.com/ > > This can losslessly compress 32-bit floating > point WAVE-EX files (which FLAC does not do), and faithfully preserves > every chunk (which FLAC does do perfectly). It is also free. Brian _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list Flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
