I think it should just have an arm reach out of the computer monitor
and hit them on the head with a bat.

( A nerf bat of course )

In all honesty, its only giving the codec a bad name to people who
didn't bother to even learn about it for one second. Setting these
kind of people strait is a lifes work for many a thinking man, but it
is not my battle.


-David

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Markus Ewald <[email protected]> wrote:
>  On 1/7/2011 11:42 PM, Jørgen Vigdal wrote:
>> Hi Brian.
>>
>> I also agree with you on these points you mention. If you guys are familiar 
>> on how the piracy groups work on the internet, you are aware that they have 
>> "releases" with their names on it. In the piracy "scene", some groups are 
>> competing on getting the first release out, and could only be beaten by 
>> another group releasing another higher quality release. Some groups (or even 
>> individuals) are releasing their stuff that is being "ripped off" another 
>> release, and they transcode the original release (mp3 320kbps for example) 
>> to a flac release (that really isn't a flac).
>>
>> Some of these groups or individuals are young people, tinking that they know 
>> everything. My idea was based on this. It would be fun stopping this, and 
>> also, as you mention in your answer, having fun and experimenting with the 
>> flac code.
>>
> ... that really sucks. Pirates giving a genuinely great codec a bad name
> because of the way their ecosystem promotes treachery. Though I wonder
> if they wouldn't self-regulate by requiring EAC .logs or something like
> that?
>
> I think an simple tool that is run on existing FLAC files and gives a
> clear good/bad answer (perhaps with a probability to remain fair) could
> spread like wildfire amongst audiophiles if publicized in the right
> channels.
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> J.
> -Markus-
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flac-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Flac-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Reply via email to