Dennis Brunnenmeyer <[email protected]> wrote: > Somewhere I thought I saw a list of proposed extensions to the small set > of pre-defined vorbis comments. If adopted, would these become part of > the FLAC standard, or would they stand alone as recommended practice.
This is something I did. The spreadsheet is called "FieldNames.xls" and can be found here: https://sites.google.com/site/mytemporarydownloads/ Note that it has two sheets, the first of which is the more interesting. VorbisComments are not part of the FLAC standard other than they can be included in FLAC streams. To that extent, if adopted they would be part of FLAC. However, my proposal was quietly ignored, so I believe we can safely say that it will not be adopted. > I don't recall what was on the list that I saw, but ALBUMARTIST should > be on it if it isn't already there. Nope, not there. That one didn't seem to be being used in the wild. What informaton would you want to put in it? Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
