I seem to recall that changes in the second number indicated a minor change in the *format* of the file itself (for example, 1.1.x to 1.2.x introduced a new rice coding option used for 24-bit files). Are there any format changes that would justify that ? Otherwise, 1.2.2 would seem more appropriate, not to minimize the work that you are doing...
Cheers, Pyt. http://www.mjuware.com On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo - mle...@mega-nerd.com <flac-dev.pyt.682528eb7b.mle+la#mega-nerd....@ob.0sg.net> wrote: > I'm currently looking to name it 1.3.0rc1. 1.3.0 because its been so > long since the last offical release and because of the change of > maintainership. > -- Pierre-Yves Thoulon +33 (0)6 33 39 75 76
_______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
