Brian Willoughby wrote: > Hmm, if this huge patch breaks the tests, how do we know whether > 1.3.0 is performing identically to 1.2.1?
The only way I can conceive of this "breaking the tests" is by making the test fail in a very obvious manner. > I'm thinking that there is a possibility that the tests might produce > a false positive. >From the patches I've seen so far I think that possibility is vanishingly small. > It seems safer to only change the library or the > tests, but not both at the same time. The tests and the library have already been changed for this release. Thesse patches don't make our problem any worse. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
