lvqcl wrote: > So, about the patches from > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2014-March/004577.html > > * The patch cpu_part1.patch should be applied; > > * The patch cpu_part2.patch (already applied) is almost useless now, so > why keep it? > It can be useful only for those who want to use MinGW/GCC to compile > Win95-compatible > libFLAC.dll or Win95/WinNT4 compatible flac.exe. Do these people exist?
It looks like I applied the the part1 patch and didn't apply the part2 patch. Please check commit 99d5154f436b389758d6a9020e448b8dbedb14bc. Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
