Martijn van Beurden wrote: >> flac-website Git is also slightly outdated (dead links, some text >> is obsolete, etc). Maybe it's time to update it too? > > Yeah, I might do that sometime soon.
Great. I just posted a message about problematic places in html docs that I found. >> And, doc/html/* in flac Git is even older. > > I've cleaned that up quite recently: > http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=943384d7c3301c1fb54096e2250db36435d3943c > > Is there anything specific you're referring too? Aside from > quite a lot of links to the sourceforge bugtracker that are now > 301-forwarded, there aren't much 404's to fix there, right? I meant the files themselves are older. For example, documentation_bugs.html: http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac-website.git;a=blob_plain;f=documentation_bugs.html;hb=HEAD "The following are major known bugs in the current (1.2.1) release:" http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=blob_plain;f=doc/html/documentation_bugs.html;hb=HEAD "The following are major known bugs in the current (1.1.4) release:" _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
