Le 03/12/2014 18:14, Brian Willoughby a écrit :
> On Dec 3, 2014, at 8:30 AM, Martijn van Beurden <mva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Op 03-12-14 om 16:48 schreef Olivier Tristan:
>>> This patch changes the settings associated with compression
>>> levels 6, 7 and 8. With this patch, -e is no longer used, but
>>> instead apodization functions are added. This should improve
>>> compression with at least 95% of all material. Independent tests
>>> show that this is probably the case.
>> As it turns out, the material for which the compression didn't
>> improve is mostly 'quiet' material.
> I would like to point out that 'quiet' material is common when making 
> original recordings.
>
> I do a great deal of live recording, and the levels are always quiet in order 
> to guard against clipping. These live recordings are then archived via FLAC 
> to make sure nothing is lost.
>
> There are also field recording units that record directly to FLAC, and they 
> will also see relatively 'quiet' recordings compared to fully mastered 
> commercial CD music. Even though those recorders might not be updated to the 
> latest FLAC sources, I would hope that things are not getting worse for a 
> whole category of FLAC users.
>
> Basically, I'm worried that the FLAC sources are being fine-tuned to handle 
> only the subset of audio represented by commercial CDs, without regard for 
> 24-bit or raw tracks that have not been fully mastered. It's interesting to 
> note that the original FLAC algorithms performed quite well across the board, 
> but recent 'improvements' are sacrificing performance in one area to enhance 
> performance in another area. Are these the sorts of things that can be 
> handled by expanding the compression options, rather than thwarting existing 
> performance?
>

It's the case actually
Using
-l 12 -b 4096 -m -e -r 6
will bring the previous --best behavior if understand correctly

-- 
Olivier Tristan
Research & Development
www.uvi.net

_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Reply via email to