> MauritsVB wrote: > >> Ars Technica reports of ‘abandoned projects’ on SourceForge being taken >> over by SourceForge with adware installers added to executables. >> >> This might be something to be wary of with FLAC considering the main focus >> for FLAC has moved from SourceForge to Xiph.org. Perhaps consider to remove >> the downloads from SourceForge but keep the ticket system there? > > I was aware of for the Win-gimp issue. What I'd like to know is how > SF.net figures out if a project is abandoned. > > Erik > The response from SF suggests that it’s non-responsiveness from the original project owner. Hopefully it’s limited to that.
Maurits _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
