lvqcl wrote: > It would be great to test it thoroughly, yes.
It turns out that the current structure of the tests makes using the GNU coverage tool maximally difficult. Getting coverage data is designed to be done in a single run of a program. Unfortunately, the FLAC test suite runs most of the test programs tens or ever hundreds of times, each with a different set of parameters. To get proper coverage data, the coverage data for each individual run would need to be given a unique file name and then the hundreds of different coverage data files merged. This is not an simple task. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
