--- Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *I'm not sure why flac -d 1.flac 2.flac 3.flac outputs sequential
> wavs
> rather than one big wav; is this intentional and/or needed? I
> suppose
> the "one big wav" approach would require flac to look at all input
> files
> to write the proper wav header at the front, but that should be
> do-able...?
if you mean (I think)
flac -d -c 1.flac 2.flac 3.flac
it's doable and seems intuitive... I'll add it to the TODO list.
Josh
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
