I've never used it so I don't know... --- Didier Eggerickx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, > > Different how? When displaying the wave in Cool Edit (it's to say, > the FLAC > file itself is opened and decoded through the Chapman filter), the > audio > wave result shows little differences : changes in frequencies at a > given > time, lower or higher; not many changes, but changes! I attribute > this to > the filter, because when decoding with your soft, already used for > encoding, > no problem at all, the two waves are exactly identical, in Cool Edit, > and > with a binary comparison tool like Windiff, Dos FC, or so...no > difference at > all!! > Can you confirm this? > > Didier > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:00 PM > Subject: Flac Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7 > > > Send Flac mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Flac digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: James Chapman Flac 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool Edit Pro v2 > (Josh Coalson) > 2. Re: flac files (Richard) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:22:45 -0800 (PST) > From: Josh Coalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Flac] James Chapman Flac 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool > Edit > Pro v2 > To: Didier Eggerickx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > --- Didier Eggerickx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Paranoïac? Maybe... When encoding my files in FLAC, and using the > > Verify option, I do a final test with Cool Edit Pro v2.0, which > used > > a flac.flt file created by James Chapman for Flac v 1.1.2. > > The problem is that, when decoding a Flac file with the Josh > Coalson > > soft, I obtain the same file, in content in size than the original > > WAV file, but when opening the FLAC file in Cool Edit (using thus > > this file filter), the result is most of the time a little > different > > than the WAV (original or decoded) file. I say "most of the time" > > because in two cases, it was also exactly the same. How can you > > explain that? > > I have the same problem with MP3, but MP3 is lossy, and I don't > know > > on which version of which encoder it is based, so, in this case, > it's > > more understanding... > > Thanks for your answer, > > different how? see also > http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#tools__wave_flac_wave > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. > http://new.mail.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:06:20 -0500 > From: Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Flac] flac files > To: Mark Rudholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > simple, not everyone has a ipod of sorts... > and some of my friends just have a cd player.. > that can play mp3 but not flac or ogg files.. > > > Rich > > > On Monday 13 November 2006 2:27 pm, you wrote: > > Now that that's hopefully clear, my question would be > > "why do you want to do this?" Since CD-ROM discs aren't > > very capacious and FLAC tends to yield only about a 2:1 > > compression ratio, it only halves the number of discs you'd > > have to carry around. Players with internal disk or flash > > memory can hold data equivalent to up to 100 CD-ROMs and > > are far smaller than any CD player. > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Flac mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac > > > End of Flac Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7 > *********************************** > > > _______________________________________________ > Flac mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Don't quit your job - take classes online www.Classesusa.com _______________________________________________ Flac mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
