On 2/11/08, Josh Coalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > let me know if that doesn't have enough info.
I'd say it had enough info, but too much for what I needed. I ended up finding the answer in oggenc/flac.c: it's "\177FLAC" not "fLaC" as ogginfo claimed. Is this right, Josh? While my patched ogginfo now detects Ogg FLAC properly, I'm not sure if this is the correct method. ogginfo only checks for magic and packet size. -Ivo _______________________________________________ Flac mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
