Chris,

You should be careful what you ask for. Unless there is silence between every track, multiple replay gain values during playback will cause an abrupt volume change at the track marker, depending upon how the player implements replay gain. You may have a collection of CDs where there is always silence between tracks, but many CDs have a few songs that bleed together, perhaps even the entire album is one continuous piece. Computing separate replay gain values on a group of tracks that are together in one file can backfire on you in certain cases.

Another thing to consider is that nearly 100% of albums are mastered so that all the songs have compatible volume levels. This is another reason to treat the entire CD with one replay gain. The mastering engineer may make the entire CD louder or softer than average, but the individual songs should already be matched. Of course, there are exceptions. A greatest hits CD or especially an unauthorized collection of songs probably won't be mastered correctly due to laziness or lack of budget.

i.e. There is not one "correct use" for all CDs.

Brian Willoughby
Sound Consulting


On Feb 11, 2008, at 06:40, Christopher Brown wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008 1:03 AM, Christopher Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way to correctly use the replay-gain feature on flac files
that contain an entire album (i.e., multiple tracks with seekpoints added
from a
cue sheet)?

As I understand it, flac generates replay-gain values for each flac file that you pass (it assumes they are each a track and that they comprise an album),
along with album values. If you pass a flac file that contains an entire
album (multiple tracks), it treats it as an album with only a single track.

In other words, flac's replay-gain feature doesn't seem to know about cue
sheets and/or multiple tracks in a single flac file. I would like to use
replay-gain to equate each track, which is what I meant by 'correctly use'.

Of course, I may be completely mistaken on several fronts.

--
Chris

_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac

Reply via email to