Hi,
I setup a virtual machine (using VirtualBox) with OpenBSD-4.9's install.iso.
I scp'ed the tar.gz that I downloaded from github to the virtual machine.
I than logged in (as root) from the "console" and extracted the tar.gz and
run the commands (still as root) with
./build-release.sh
./build-kernel.sh GENERIC-RD
Both scripts gave errors which I could fix by adding the ./ to the chroot
calls.
So, yes, the biggest difference is that I was root. Which for me is
acceptable on a throw-away virtual machine.
Maybe tomorrow I have some time to try again using sudo if you like; but
would adding ./ be a goodthing to anyway?
I'm happy eitherway.. I, already, greatly appreciate your work (and the work
done by previous contributors)!
Mark
rancor writes:
HTML content follows
Thank you for testing the new version.
How where you running the scripts? We have been testing this scripts for a
couple of weeks and have never seen this issue before.
sudo ./build-release.sh
sudo ./build-kernel.sh <KERNEL>
What version of OpenBSD did you use? Did you use root or did you build as a
sudoers?
Our building environment is vanilla 4.9 i386 with no changes at all.
Best regards rancor
2011/9/5 <<URL:mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]>
Hi,
I build a 4.9 kernel using the flashboot scripts I downloaded last Friday
and it worked after 2 minor tweaks. I had to add ./ to call of the scripts
in the chroot.
Line 97 in build-release.sh (add ./ to build-release-injail.sh)
Line 61 in build-kernel.sh (add ./ to build-kernel-injail.sh)
I highly appreciate your work! Thank you.
Mark
rancor writes:
HTML content follows
Hi!
The latest version of Flashboot is now available on Github.
<URL:<URL:https://github.com/openbsd/flashboot>https://github.com/openbs
d/flashboot><URL:https://github.com/openbsd/flashboot>https://github.com
/openbsd/flashboot
// rancor
_______________________________________________
flashboot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/flashboot
