> I think one of the biggest challenges for this idea would be encoding > the sound into the created swf, im not really up for writing an mp3 > encoder in actionscript. But if there is a more simple encoding scheme > that can be used then it would be one route to synthesizing and > processing audio entirely in the client. >
Why bother with compression. This just creates more processor overhead. a minute of cd quality sound should be 10mbytes. This is not so bad. I dont know if flash would have any memory issues with this but I doubt it. In any case it could be chunked. But then the issues is whether it is possible to effectively sync separate tracks. Because if it is then You dont have to worry about doing one big sound file which would reduce memory needs. But I am really curious about this loader thing. I am not really aware of it. It sounds like a huge deal. Regards Hank > martin. > > Robert A. Colvin wrote: > > http://www.richapps.de/?p=23 > > > > check it out..;) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hank > > williams > > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:07 AM > > To: Flashcoders mailing list > > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Who wants MIDI in the Flash Player? > > > > > >>the 8.5 player already has an FFT (aka sound spectrum) function built > >>in, but i think its buggy (this is what i have read, ive not tried it > > > > yet) > > > > > > Are people currently trying to do sound related stuff? > > > > Hank > > > > > >>:) > >> > >>martin > -- > Martin Wood > > http://relivethefuture.com/choronzon > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
