Well, its basically what tyler describes but using binary sockets
instead of xml sockets. The binary socket is just more efficient. I am
not sure what the issues are in implementing any of this since I am
not a midi guru, so I cant provide to much detail. Sounds like tyler
knows what he is talking about.

Regards
Hank

On 12/8/05, Jason Cunliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hank
>
> Can you expand on that idea please. Sounds interesting...
>
> thanks, Jason
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "hank williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 3:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Who wants MIDI in the Flash Player?
>
>
> Of course, in thinking about this, with the new binary socket
> functionality, midi control could all be done by just writing a simple
> localhost to midi gateway. This would be pretty simple to do, and is
> probably what is needed anyway to deal with different drivers etc. And
> it makes total sense that if you want to control some local hardware
> that you need to download a piece of software.
>
> problem solved!!  :)
>
> Regards
> Hank
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flashcoders mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Reply via email to