nice example :)) maybe let the result textfield editable, to be able past results ;)
blur: 12740 convo3x3 : 9092 convo5x5: 36517 uff no filter: 5634 it's very interesting topic, i will post in on my blog to have more results... can I? On 1/31/06, Mike Duguid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've stuck another example here: http://www.flashcool.com/blur.html > On the pc, as Mike said, convolution is faster, but if you need more > than a subtle blur may not be what's required. > > On 1/30/06, Andreas Rønning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone know which is faster; a blurring one-pass convolution filter > > or a blurfilter? Or are they just 2 sides to the same story? I need a > > high performance blur operation for depth of field.. > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Franto http://blog.franto.com http://www.flashcoders.sk _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
