On 6/21/06, matt stuehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

However, with most of our work, we develop an RIA for a client, who
handles the back-end themselves. So, we develop our apps so that they
send and receive XML, which means the client can use whatever they
want in the backend: asp, asp.net, webservices, php, whatever...

Is this a valid position? E.g., if we used amfphp, are we then
limiting our flexibility on the back-end?


There are open source implementations of AMF in .NET, Java, and PHP,
as well as closed source versions for multiple platforms, so
compatibility shouldn't be too much of a concern.

For more information look here:
http://www.osflash.org/amf

You can also add Red5 to the list presented there.

I hope that helps.

-Chris
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

Reply via email to