hank williams wrote:
This is of course true. I am excited about swhx for my application. My
only point was that it is perfectly reasonable for someone to think
that his clients or customers would prefer something else because of
the large company mentality. But I do think lots of users will not
have any political issues with swhx and will make great use of it.
Regards
Hank
Sure, I can see that line of reasoning. One can debate over whether
developers or customers are wrong or right on finding using open source
software unattractive, and all its pro's and con's, but I think no one
has been able to answer that question conclusively.
If SWHX proofs to be a strong concept and gets enough helping hands to
make it evolve over time, it will become increasingly easier to 'sell it
to customers', though. So, I'm hoping that will happen.
Meanwhile, I'm already content that together with Nicolas I've taken
another step forward in what I've been trying to achieve with
Screenweaver for over half a decade now: Providing a framework for
creating serious Flash interfaced desktop applications. In that regard,
I'm also very excited about Apollo developments: Can't wait to see it!
Best,
Edwin
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
