Sorry, I don't buy the "time factor" argument. Everything, including webservices and flash remoting was already there, written for Flex 2.
Unfortunatly you can not just grab the webservice/remoting source files and copy them over to Flash, they're compiled as a swc file. UI Component class source files (like the Tree) are available, so you might be able to just grab those. regards, Muzak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Austin Kottke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 11:44 PM Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash CS3 Prof copy: missing Tree component. >I think the main factor on the components was more of a time factor to meet >with the CS3 release timing as opposed to just removing >functionality. > > Most new releases of a software don't remove functionality, but deprecate it. > Removing something like the tree component or web > services from flash 9 cs3 is a major mistake. It appears to me that to > implement it in actionscript 3.0 is a major undertaking -- > the funny thing is that most of the code is done in the flex framework. > > Take the example of where some ads or placements that require web services in > flash require the movie to be under 100K. > > This is impossible to do with flex because of just the sheer nature of the > download size. > > If enough of us request it from adobe I'm sure it will get integrated. It > seems that it was more of a time factor decision than > anything else. _______________________________________________ [email protected] To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
