AMF is another way of saying "Remoting".  Flex 1.0 and 1.5 came with 
Remoting included, much like ColdFusion does.  Once OpenAMF and AMFPHP 
figure out the new AMF, we'll have no need of the Enterprise Services... at 
least for Remoting.  They are far much more than just remoting.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "hank williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Macromedia unveiling Flex 2andFlash9 
:communicationor cacophony ?


Well, paraphrasing from the manual.

"AMF requires flex enterprise services".

I have read the docs for this section pretty thoroughly for this
section and it definitely says this.

Now, obviously, the old AMF client side code can be ported to AS3, but
MM has no intent of making it easy or giving it away. They make
absolutely clear in the doc that AMF requires flex enterprise
services.

Regards
Hank.

On 10/19/05, Martin Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (except for the fact that they seem to be trying to kill
> > open source remoting... damn cant they just compete on features!)
>
> Hank, i really dont think this is true.
>
> if you check the new docs you'll see that AMF is still in the new
> player, BUT there is a new version of AMF (AMF3) which contains
> improvements to the protocol.
>
> and like the old and new VM, the two AMF protocols can exist happily
> side by side in the the new player.
>
> thats how it seems to me anyway.
>
> thanks,
>
>
> martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flashcoders mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders 

_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Reply via email to