Hi,

In Flex Builder 2, you can write AS only projects and connect to
anything you want :)

In the Flex framework itself, Flex framework 2.0 will not support older
AMF.  However, you can also always write your own extensions to the
framework and I am not aware of any reason you couldn't write a
connector for the older AMF. (I am not the expert here.)

-David 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of hank williams
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 8:17 AM
> To: Flashcoders mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Macromedia unveiling Flex 
> 2andFlash9:communicationor cacophony ?
> 
> David,
> 
> I just have one question. Will the flex 2 client side tools 
> allow me to connect to the old AMF servers. The docs *seem* 
> to say no. If this is not your intent and if this is wrong, I 
> apologize for any confusion I may have added to the situatuion.
> 
> Thanks
> Hank
> 
> On 10/19/05, David Mendels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a misunderstanding.  Flex Enterprise Services 
> includes the new 
> > AMF gateway but I am sure the folks building OpenAMF or 
> RubyAMF or etc 
> > etc will at some point implement the new version.  We have nothing 
> > really against the open source projects.  We are adding a lot of 
> > functionality, performance, manageability to Flex 
> Enterprise Services 
> > and hope that will be valuable to people.  But we aren't trying to 
> > "kill" anything.  The Open Source community may well compete with 
> > Macromedia in some areas, but much more important we want a rich 
> > ecosystem with a lot of tools that solve a lot of different 
> needs from 
> > a lot of different people and companies to make the Flash Platform 
> > successful for more people. I hope instead of us focusing 
> on "killing"
> > open source, or the open source community focusing on "killing"
> > Macromedia, both can look at how we all can add value to to the 
> > community and leverage and extend each others work.
> >
> > Regards,
> > David
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of hank 
> > > williams
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 6:07 AM
> > > To: Flashcoders mailing list
> > > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Macromedia unveiling Flex
> > > 2andFlash9 :communicationor cacophony ?
> > >
> > > Well, paraphrasing from the manual.
> > >
> > > "AMF requires flex enterprise services".
> > >
> > > I have read the docs for this section pretty thoroughly for this 
> > > section and it definitely says this.
> > >
> > > Now, obviously, the old AMF client side code can be 
> ported to AS3, 
> > > but MM has no intent of making it easy or giving it away. 
> They make 
> > > absolutely clear in the doc that AMF requires flex enterprise 
> > > services.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Hank.
> > >
> > > On 10/19/05, Martin Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > (except for the fact that they seem to be trying to kill
> > > > > open source remoting... damn cant they just compete on 
> > > > > features!)
> > > >
> > > > Hank, i really dont think this is true.
> > > >
> > > > if you check the new docs you'll see that AMF is still 
> in the new 
> > > > player, BUT there is a new version of AMF (AMF3) which contains 
> > > > improvements to the protocol.
> > > >
> > > > and like the old and new VM, the two AMF protocols can
> > > exist happily
> > > > side by side in the the new player.
> > > >
> > > > thats how it seems to me anyway.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > martin
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Flashcoders mailing list
> > > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> > > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Flashcoders mailing list
> > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Flashcoders mailing list
> > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Flashcoders mailing list
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> 
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Reply via email to