All the .NET remoting software costs money, but it is quite a bit faster. Web services are easy and free, but slower.
And you're right, they are alternatives. You could use .NET remoting to connect to web services that would ordinarily be unavailable to Flash...maybe that's what they mean. Scott -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gavin Lilley Sent: December 12, 2005 5:11 AM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: [Flashcoders] remoting v service <javascript:setIrrelevant(1573074);> Due to changes beyond my control, I am now working on a M$ .NET/MSSQL server and need to migrate my old php/mysql code over. The php code includes AMFPHP Remoting classes. I am looking at either porting the classes into ASP Remoting or creating a set of wsdl Web services. Can anyone give me any insight into why they would use one technology over the other please? I have read that the two technologies combined work well, I dont understand this as I see a web service as an alternative to remoting - am I missing something here? -- Gavin Lilley _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
