That's not 100% true. You must have a Flex license for the server where the swf is served from, but you don't have to have Flex installed on it.
I've worked with a couple of clients who use this configuration. Spike On 12/21/05, JesterXL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope, Flex 1 and Flex 1.5. > > Flex 1 and Flex 1.5 require a server if you wish to remain legal. While you > can easily create SWF's from Flex 1 and Flex 1.5 and run them independently, > unless they were served from a server that has Flex 1 or 1.5 installed, > that's illegal. > > Flex 2 does not have this legal requirement, and once you create a SWF, you > can do whatever you want with it. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adrian Showater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:11 AM > Subject: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo > > > JesterXL, please clarify: > > "Flex 1.5 and 2 allow you to compile stand alone SWF's. Flex 1.5, however, > requires the Flex server to be installed on the box where the SWF is > deployed to." > > Am I correct in assuming that you mean that Flex 1 requires the server while > all subsequent versions do not? > > > Adrian Showalter > Software Developer > Holmes BizNet > www.HolmesBizNet.com <http://www.HolmesBizNet.com> > 330.893.3901 ext 102 > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > -- -------------------------------------------- Stephen Milligan Do you do the Badger? http://www.yellowbadger.com Do you cfeclipse? http://www.cfeclipse.org _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
