I know where he is coming from, though. I knew one client that refused to upgrade from a Flash 5 + Generator application that has been in use for 5 years. Thankfully, I didn't have the glorious duty of maintainng it, but damn!
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerry Creighton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:41 PM Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] IE on mac documentation Maybe you can suggest that this browser is dead...using facts. Otherwise they could argue that the flash site should work on IE 4. They won't but it's the same argument. New macs since Safari came out didn't ship with IE so he must be using an older OS as well. On Jan 9, 2006, at 9:29 AM, Caleb E. Brown wrote: > Yes, it is. However, people still use it. Like my client. And > that's where the problems start. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXL > Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 10:09 PM > To: Flashcoders mailing list > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] IE on mac documentation > > Not anymore; IE for Mac is dead. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ryan Luce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 5:16 PM > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] IE on mac documentation > > > There were all kinds of problems with mac ie and flash. All kinds > of stuff > would work with every browser except it. Very frustrating. > > On 1/6/06, John Dowdell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Caleb E. Brown wrote: >>> I'm trying to find out if there are any known differences between >>> the >>> video/audio quality in the plugin for IE and the safari/netscape >>> plugin >> >> Hmm, for "Will SWF a/v play comparably across browsers?" then it >> usually >> will, but there can definitely be situations where something weird >> happens... for awhile Firefox/Mac would interfere with normal SWF >> performance, for instance: >> http://weblogs.macromedia.com/emmy/archives/2005/11/ >> firefox_15_avai.cfm >> >> But assuming the browsers have the same amount of memory >> available, the >> same amount of windows open, the same number of background tasks >> going >> on and so on, then they're generally pretty close in supporting >> audio/video... small differences, for sure, but rarely controversial >> differences. >> >> Are you seeing any particular problem yourself? If so, is there >> some way >> that other people could make it happen too? >> >> jd >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> John Dowdell . Adobe Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA >> Weblog: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/jd >> Aggregator: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna >> Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/ >> Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks. >> _______________________________________________ >> Flashcoders mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders >> > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release Date: > 1/6/2006 > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release Date: > 1/6/2006 > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
