>From a background standpoint, ARP was created originally for Flash. 
Cairngorm was originally created for JSP developers coming to Flex.

ARP, the current publicly available build, is mostly created around 
ActionScript base classes.  Cairngorm is around both ActionScript and MXML.

I've found success with ARP in Flash and Flex, although, almost everyone I 
know utilizes Cairngorm in Flex.  In fact, my last project was using ARP in 
Flex, but now I'm using Cairngorm since it's bigger in scope and the rest of 
the team utilizes it.

Both have a lot in common (ServiceLocators, ModelLocators [I added to my 
build of ARP], Commands, Business Delegates, and some concept of a 
Controller/Application).  Cairngorm takes it a step farther with optional 
usage of ViewHelpers and ViewLocators.  I don't really like the concept of 
ViewHelpers, but I can see the rare need for a ViewLocator.  I hear in 
larger scoped projects, Cairngorm's concepts have more value.  Since most of 
mine have been 4 to 6 month timeframes with 1 to 2 developers, they aren't 
really considered huge.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Weyert de Boer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 5:32 PM
Subject: [Flashcoders] ARP or Cairngorm


What's the best framework to use when you want to be able to make flash
application 1-2-3 in Flash or Flex with practically the same way. Of
course, you have MXML in Flex. Because I want to move more to a MVC
approach in Flash, I am asking myself which framework I should use.
Anyone any suggestions? I have mainly experience with patterns in
Delphi, C# and PHP5 etc.
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders 

_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Reply via email to