There's obviously no question about the value of the security sandbox and the crossdomain policy control. The issue for me is that 'www.' should not be considered a subdomain. This is inexcusable and will catch out a lot of people, particularly given the dreadful documentation.
Clark On 1/27/06, ryanm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't see upside. It just sucks. > > > The upside is that it keeps people from stealing your Flash content. It > lets you explicitly state who is allowed to consume your Flash content, > which is a good thing as long as there is an easy way to allow more > access, > which there is. Look up "crossdomain policy file" in the Flash help. > > ryanm > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
