In my tests convolution filter was much faster than a blurfilter. But it's an easy one to swap oout and test for yourself...
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Andreas Rønning > Sent: 30 January 2006 10:03 > To: Flashcoders mailing list > Subject: [Flashcoders] ConvolutionFilter performance > > Does anyone know which is faster; a blurring one-pass > convolution filter or a blurfilter? Or are they just 2 sides > to the same story? I need a high performance blur operation > for depth of field.. > > Cheers, > > - Andreas > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
