In that test the convolution filter came out marginally faster than no filters at all!
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Mike Duguid > Sent: 31 January 2006 13:05 > To: Flashcoders mailing list > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ConvolutionFilter performance > > I've stuck another example here: http://www.flashcool.com/blur.html > On the pc, as Mike said, convolution is faster, but if you > need more than a subtle blur may not be what's required. _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
