and i got 2.8Ghx, 512MB Ram PC :) On 1/31/06, franto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but not on PC :)) > > On 1/31/06, Mike Mountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In that test the convolution filter came out marginally faster than no > > filters at all! > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > > Of Mike Duguid > > > Sent: 31 January 2006 13:05 > > > To: Flashcoders mailing list > > > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ConvolutionFilter performance > > > > > > I've stuck another example here: http://www.flashcool.com/blur.html > > > On the pc, as Mike said, convolution is faster, but if you > > > need more than a subtle blur may not be what's required. > > _______________________________________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Franto > > http://blog.franto.com > http://www.flashcoders.sk >
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Franto http://blog.franto.com http://www.flashcoders.sk _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
