I guess I'm just wondering whether he even read the earlier responses.

Compile-time type checking clearly makes this a good decision for medium to 
large-sized projects. As soon as you start dealing with dynamic types (Object 
and MovieClip), you're asking for trouble. I know, because I've been there. 
Everyone makes typos here and there, and when that typo doesn't generate 
compiler errors, it becomes a bug instead. 

This is not OOP fanatisism talking. It's experience. I understand that 
ActionStep, being a dynamic language, shouldn't be treated as if it is 
Java...but as far as type-checking goes, I'm going to take as much of it as I 
can get.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Scott Hyndman
Sent:   Wed 2/1/2006 6:45 PM
To:     Flashcoders mailing list
Cc:     
Subject:        RE: [Flashcoders] Tell me more about "_professionalism"
heh, yeah. I'm sorry. That was bad...

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Merrill, Jason
Sent:   Wed 2/1/2006 6:21 PM
To:     Flashcoders mailing list
Cc:     
Subject:        RE: [Flashcoders] Tell me more about "_professionalism"
>From the RE: [Flashcoders] Tell me more about "_global" thread:

>>You are clearly an idiot.
>>
>>Scott

Wow, are we really getting that low now?  C'mom guys, lets make a choice
here:  1)keep it professional, 2)take it off-list, or 3) end it.  I'm
not the first to request that.  A simple "I disagree with your
statement" should suffice.  Why would it not?  We were getting into some
good stuff for a second there, before the all the 6th grade name calling
began.  

Jason Merrill   |   E-Learning Solutions   |  icfconsulting.com








NOTICE:
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or 
confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of this e-mail by you 
is prohibited.
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders






_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Reply via email to