Granted, its also how you use it... XPath does have the potential to be slow in certain situations in Flash and with certain XML setups. But usually, you're good to go, especially with the example you gave.
Jason Merrill | E-Learning Solutions | icfconsulting.com >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders- >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kent Humphrey >>Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 5:44 PM >>To: Flashcoders mailing list >>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] xpath / xpath4as2 beginners question >> >>Merrill, Jason wrote: >>> Xpath is quick enough to read it directly each time. It's what I like >>> about it. >> >>Fantastic. Thanks for all the info. >>_______________________________________________ >>Flashcoders mailing list >>Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com >>http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders NOTICE: This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of this e-mail by you is prohibited. _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
