The US Patent Office is a mess and I suspect that most software patents like this one are not valid since their are lots of examples of prior art. This patent would be challenged by every big company if the owners ever tried to enforce it. They would have a hard time proving that they were the first to build a RIA.

There is a bigger problem in the making.
The proposed US law to move the patent process to a "first-to-file" basis will be the end of open source development and be a big impediment to any custom software work.

This is a serious issue and the American business community had better get their act together and put a stop to that proposed law.

What the new law appears to do is to say that it does not matter who invents something, it only matters who files for the patent first. This will mean that anyone can monitor open source projects looking for new ideas and then file patents on them. They only have to extract the core of the idea, describe it and go. They do not have to disclose how they discovered it and only have to worry that someone else is applying for the same stolen idea at the same time. The original author then has to notice that the patent application has been filed and protest to the Patent Office within some delay (60 days or some relatively short period). This means that every open source project will have to employ a full-time patent lawyer to protect the work. Every little detail will have to be patented to protect your right to use the code that you write and you will have to monitor each day's patent filings and prepare a legal objection to each patent that is filed on ideas already in common use.

This is obviously being backed by the big companies(IBM, Microsoft,SCO) and patent squatting operations that can afford to set up a poaching operation to find new ideas from open source projects and patent them before the authors realize that the idea is worth patenting.

The impact on American business will be huge over the long term., if you think of all of the software that is based on open source and the chilling effect that this will have on custom software development. You will not be able to write a program for a client or within an IT department without patenting everything that you suspect might be innovative for fear of waking up in 2 years to find out that someone is knocking on your door saying that they patented the process long after you wrote the program and that you or your employer or your customer are in violation of their patent even if you wrote the code long before they applied for a patent. You can not be sure when you write the code even if you check for existing patents. Each programmer will have to provided with a patent lawyer to do the searches and prepare the documentation to file patents and to negotiate license agreements for ideas already patented. The cost for business will be huge.

This law is slowly being pushed through the US Congress - drug companies seem to be behind this as well.

If you are an American or have American clients, urge them to write their elected representatives to warn against this law. If you are outside the US, write to your elected representatives to urge them to protest to the US government and start the process to cease to recognize US Patents based on this proposed law.

If we wait for the law to be passed, there will be years of chaos and endless litigation before the law can be repealed.

This document promotes first-to file.
http://www4.nationalacademies.org/news.nsf/isbn/0309089107?OpenDocument

This is a blog that discusses the progress of the bill through Congress.
http://promotetheprogress.com/archives/2006/01/more_smoke_sign.html

Ron

stefano wrote:

I found it while browsing, read it and remained stuck...

Take a look, please

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1
&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,000,180.WKU.&OS=PN/7,000,180&RS=P
N/7,000,180

...It sounds strange to me (I am from Italy)...but...If this
applies...wow...Will we have to pay for royalties ??

I know the above is not CODING MATTERS but...

Bye

Stef


_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

Reply via email to