I did a search through the list and on Google for this but couldn't find
mention about this issue.
Has anyone ever tried using __resolve on a class that extends another
class?
I'm using __resolve to handle the multitude of methods that will be called
on this class, which actually calls a 3rd party API. The class has some
smarts for some of the methods and provides an interface to parameters via
the parameters panel.
The class extends UIComponent.
Initially I was getting a 256 loop error and then nothing, after some
tinkering.
After some debugging I put a trace in the __resolve function and what I've
found is that any calls to superclass members are ending up in the
__resolve and thus not working.
It's as though the inheritted members are not really on the subclass.
That's the best I can explain it.
I've simplified the class:
import mx.core.UIComponent;
class Browser extends UIComponent
{
public var dispatchEvent:Function;
public var addEventListener:Function;
public var removeEventListener:Function;
function Browser()
{
}
public function init()
{
super.init();
}
public function go()
{
dispatchEvent({type:'gone'});
}
public function __resolve()
{
var method = arguments.shift();
return function ()
{
trace(method+':'+arguments);
}
}
}
Then in frame 1 I add a listener for the 'gone' event and execute
myInstance.go();
This is the output:
initProperties:
createAccessibilityImplementation:
_endInit:
dispatchEvent:[object Object]
addEventListener:gone,_level0
dispatchEvent:[object Object]
The event handler never gets called.
Does anyone know why this happens? Is it not possible to use __resolve in
this way?
Derek Vadneau
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
